Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Granger-Geweke causality: Estimation and interpretation

  • Mukesh Dhamala (Corresponding Author)
  • , Hualou Liang
  • , Steven L. Bressler
  • , Mingzhou Ding

Research output: Journal article publication › Journal article › Academic research › peer-review

Abstract

In a recent PNAS article1, Stokes and Purdon performed numerical simulations to argue that Granger-Geweke causality (GGC) estimation is severely biased, or of high variance, and GGC application to neuroscience is problematic because the GGC measure is independent of ‘receiver’ dynamics. Here, we use the same simulation examples to show that GGC measures, when properly estimated either via the spectral factorization-enabled nonparametric approach or the VAR-model based parametric approach, do not have the claimed bias and high variance problems. Further, the receiver-independence property of GGC does not present a problem for neuroscience applications. When the nature and context of experimental measurements are taken into consideration, GGC, along with other spectral quantities, yield neurophysiologically interpretable results.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)460-463
Number of pages4
JournalNeuroImage
Volume175
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 21 Apr 2018
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neurology
  • Cognitive Neuroscience

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Granger-Geweke causality: Estimation and interpretation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this