Abstract
Research has not conclusively determined whether men and women are equally likely to commit intimate partner violence (IPV). One explanation for the disparity in previous findings may be gender-based differences in reporting styles. The present study investigated whether there was any gender difference in self-reported IPV prevalence. A total of 3,740 Chinese couples from a representative population in Hong Kong were interviewed. Self-reports of men-to-women and women-to-men IPV between spouses were compared. Gender was controlled for to evaluate whether age, education, the Chinese concept of face, and other violence-related characteristics would affect the self-reporting of IPV. Findings supported gender symmetry in self-reported IPV prevalence as well as a moderate interspousal agreement in the self-reports. After adjustment for covariates, face was a significant factor predicting the interspousal differences in both men-to-women and women-to-men physical IPV.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 263-286 |
| Number of pages | 24 |
| Journal | Journal of Interpersonal Violence |
| Volume | 27 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Jan 2012 |
| Externally published | Yes |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- Chinese
- gender symmetry
- intimate partner violence
- reporting
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Clinical Psychology
- Applied Psychology
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Gender Symmetry in the Self-Reporting of Intimate Partner Violence'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver