Abstract
As the sustainable aviation fuels (SAF) have been increasingly utilized in the aviation industry, the comparison among the existing types of SAF in terms of their production costs and the efficacy of mitigating emissions has become important. This investigation aims to assess the trade-off between cost increases and emission reductions throughout the SAF lifecycle. A stepwise multiple linear regression model is utilized to forecast the production costs associated with 29 distinct SAF production pathways. Furthermore, an all-encompassing model has been developed to determine the costs associated with carbon mitigation over time. The findings demonstrate that the Hydroprocessed Esters and Fatty Acids (HEFA) pathway is most cost-effective, with the lowest production cost pegged at $1.45 per liter. In contrast, the carbon mitigation cost for the Fischer-Tropsch (FT) pathway is the most favorable, calculated at $459 per ton of CO2 equivalent. This study extends current cost analyses to the prediction of future production expenses, highlighting the significance of temporal variations in mitigation costs. The findings provide customized recommendations, such as for developing SAF with different pathways with uneven priorities.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 103843 |
| Journal | Transport Policy |
| Volume | 174 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Dec 2025 |
Keywords
- Emission reduction
- Production cost
- Stepwise multiple linear regression
- Sustainable aviation fuel
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Geography, Planning and Development
- Transportation
- Law
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Fueling the future: A comparative analysis of sustainable aviation fuel pathways'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver