Formal versus informal supervisor socio-emotional support behaviours and employee trust: The role of cultural power distance

Jaee Cho, S. Arzu WASTI, Krishna Savani, Hwee Hoon TAN, Michael W. Morris

Research output: Journal article publicationJournal articleAcademic researchpeer-review

Abstract

This research investigates how formal versus informal supervisor support behaviours shape employees' affect- and cognition-based trust across cultures of varying power distance. Using data from in-depth interviews, Study 1 found that trust-enhancing supervisor behaviours were more formal, status conscious and imposing in India (a high power distance culture) than in the Netherlands (a low power distance culture); unlike in India, supervisors acted more like friends or equals with their subordinates in the Netherlands. Using vignettes, Study 2 found that, compared to informal support behaviours, formal support behaviours increased both affect- and cognition-based trust among Indian participants, but among US participants, formal support behaviours only increased cognition-based trust. Study 3 conceptually replicated those findings by manipulating power distance in an organization. Together, the findings from these three studies suggest that supervisors' formal socio-emotional support behaviours are particularly effective in increasing affect-based trust in societal and organizational cultures that are high power distance.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)203-218
Number of pages16
JournalAsian Journal of Social Psychology
Volume27
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2024

Keywords

  • culture
  • formal
  • informal
  • power distance
  • socio-emotional support
  • trust

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology
  • General Social Sciences

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Formal versus informal supervisor socio-emotional support behaviours and employee trust: The role of cultural power distance'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this