TY - JOUR
T1 - For you and for me
T2 - harvesting the benefits of prosocial spending in romantic relationships
AU - Li, Sisi
AU - Ng, Jacky Chi Kit
AU - Hui, Chin Ming
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was funded by the Hong Kong Research Grants Council under Early Career Scheme (ECS; 24600415). The authors are grateful to John Martino for his editorial help on an earlier version of this article.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2022/1
Y1 - 2022/1
N2 - This dyadic diary study explored how romantic partners benefit from prosocial spending within their relationships. For each of 21 days, couple members indicated whether they spent money on their partner and, if yes, reported the amount of money spent and the type(s) of purchase involved. Participants also completed daily measures of perceived partner responsiveness, and personal and relational well-being. Actor-partner interdependence model analyses showed that (a) the actor’s daily personal and relational well-being were associated with both the actor’s and the partner’s prosocial spending; (b) the actor’s perception of partner’s responsiveness mediated the effect of the partner’s prosocial spending on the actor’s well-being; and (c) experiential purchase (viz., food and other experiences) was associated with both parties’ relational well-being, but material purchase (viz., necessities) was not. Additional analyses suggested that (d) individual differences in prosocial concerns (viz., socioeconomic status and communal motivation) were associated with prosocial spending on one’s partner. (150 words).
AB - This dyadic diary study explored how romantic partners benefit from prosocial spending within their relationships. For each of 21 days, couple members indicated whether they spent money on their partner and, if yes, reported the amount of money spent and the type(s) of purchase involved. Participants also completed daily measures of perceived partner responsiveness, and personal and relational well-being. Actor-partner interdependence model analyses showed that (a) the actor’s daily personal and relational well-being were associated with both the actor’s and the partner’s prosocial spending; (b) the actor’s perception of partner’s responsiveness mediated the effect of the partner’s prosocial spending on the actor’s well-being; and (c) experiential purchase (viz., food and other experiences) was associated with both parties’ relational well-being, but material purchase (viz., necessities) was not. Additional analyses suggested that (d) individual differences in prosocial concerns (viz., socioeconomic status and communal motivation) were associated with prosocial spending on one’s partner. (150 words).
KW - communal motivation
KW - materialism
KW - Prosocial spending
KW - romantic relationships
KW - socioeconomic status
KW - well-being
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85092505397&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/17439760.2020.1832244
DO - 10.1080/17439760.2020.1832244
M3 - Journal article
AN - SCOPUS:85092505397
SN - 1743-9760
VL - 17
SP - 59
EP - 69
JO - Journal of Positive Psychology
JF - Journal of Positive Psychology
IS - 1
ER -