FEELING PRECARIOUS IN ETHNOGRAPHIC RESEARCH METHODS AND IN PERSONAL CIRCUMSTANCES: IDEAL TYPES AND REAL WORLD COMPLEXITY

Krzysztof Z. Jankowski

Research output: Chapter in book / Conference proceedingChapter in an edited book (as author)Academic researchpeer-review

Abstract

This chapter discusses the impact of the sociological imagination and ethnographic research methods on identifying the ‘real’ nature of conceptualized phenomena. The examination is done by comparing the researcher’s experience of work-related precarity in ethnographic methods and in the researcher’s personal circumstances immediately following the fieldwork. Such a juxtaposition shows what had been emphasized by ethnography and the effects of the researcher’s social context on the concepts under study. In the case of fieldwork, many of the practical difficulties of precarious work were encountered. However, the context of being an ethnographer altered how work precarity was felt. In the personal circumstances that followed the fieldwork, precariousness was strongly felt in a more general manner. This occurred in a discrete event that involved multiple factors of employment, housing, institutions relied on, and personal relationships.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationResearch in the Sociology of Work
PublisherEmerald Publishing
Pages165-172
Number of pages8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 12 Dec 2023

Publication series

NameResearch in the Sociology of Work
Volume35
ISSN (Print)0277-2833

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'FEELING PRECARIOUS IN ETHNOGRAPHIC RESEARCH METHODS AND IN PERSONAL CIRCUMSTANCES: IDEAL TYPES AND REAL WORLD COMPLEXITY'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this