Abstract
The factor structure of responses to the Chinese version of the General Health Questionnaire (CGHQ‐30) in a sample of 2,150 Chinese secondary school students was examined using the LISREL approach to confirmatory factor analysis. The results showed that while a five‐factor model (Anxiety, Depression, Inadequate Coping, Social Dysfunctioning and Sleep Disturbances) was able to fit the data, a higher‐order factor model with five primary factors (Anxiety, Depression, Inadequate Coping, Social Dysfunctioning and Sleep Disturbances) and a second‐order factor (General Psychopathology) was found to be a more parsimonious model. The present findings are discussed with reference to the controversies that surround the dimensionality of the General Health Questionnaire.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 678-684 |
| Number of pages | 7 |
| Journal | Journal of Clinical Psychology |
| Volume | 49 |
| Issue number | 5 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Jan 1993 |
| Externally published | Yes |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Clinical Psychology
- Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Factor structure of the chinese version of the general health questionnaire (GHQ‐30): A confirmatory factor analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver