Examining Perceptions and Attitudes: A Review of Likert-Type Scales Versus Q-Methodology

Research output: Journal article publicationJournal articleAcademic researchpeer-review

74 Citations (Scopus)


The purpose of this article is to compare and discuss the use of Likert-type scales and Q-methodology to examine perceptions and attitudes in nursing research. This article provides a brief review of each approach, and how they have been used to advance our knowledge in health-related perceptions and attitudes. Although Likert-type scales are economical, efficient, and easy to analyze, the results can be difficult to interpret or translate into meaningful practice. In contrast, Q-methodology yields holistic and in-depth information on what the prevailing perceptions and attitudes are, but its conduct is logistically challenging and the results’ generalizability can be limited. The appropriate uses of either or both approaches to answer different research questions will be discussed. Nurse scientists are called upon to continue our exploration, utilization, and expansion of unique methodologies that directly speak to a meaningful examination of these important constructs in nursing research.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)674-689
Number of pages16
JournalWestern Journal of Nursing Research
Issue number5
Publication statusPublished - 1 May 2017


  • attitudes
  • Likert-type scales
  • perceptions
  • Q-methodology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Nursing


Dive into the research topics of 'Examining Perceptions and Attitudes: A Review of Likert-Type Scales Versus Q-Methodology'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this