Abstract
There is an ongoing debate over uniformity versus flexibility in accounting regulation. This study examines the financial reporting consequences of a rigid accounting rule in China under which the fiscal year-end is uniform for all companies. Using extensive interviews together with large-sample archival analyses, we find that “mismatched” firms—those whose mandated financial reporting cycles are not aligned with their business cycles—exhibit higher levels of absolute abnormal accruals than their nonmismatched counterparts. Further analyses suggest that the negative association between mismatching and financial reporting quality is mainly driven by unintentional estimation errors rather than intentional earnings manipulation.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 367-396 |
| Number of pages | 30 |
| Journal | Accounting Review |
| Volume | 98 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| Early online date | 1 May 2023 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - May 2023 |
Keywords
- accounting period
- business cycle
- financial reporting quality
- uniformity
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Accounting
- Finance
- Economics and Econometrics
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Ending at the Wrong Time: The Financial Reporting Consequences of a Uniform Fiscal Year-End'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver