TY - JOUR
T1 - Effectiveness of cognitive stimulation for individuals with mild cognitive impairment
T2 - a systematic review and meta-analysis
AU - Chen, Lu Hua
AU - Lee, Oi Ling
AU - Lee, Yan Wing
AU - Ng, Shu Ting
AU - Ngai, Sum Yi Eugenia
AU - Pau, Yat Hei Zita
AU - Ma, Tongyu
AU - Yuen, Hon Lam Joseph
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 BMJ Publishing Group. All rights reserved.
PY - 2025/6/10
Y1 - 2025/6/10
N2 - Objective Cognitive stimulation (CS) is a non-pharmacological intervention aimed at enhancing cognitive function. However, the effectiveness of CS in individuals diagnosed with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) remains inconclusive. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the effectiveness of CS in improving cognitive function, psychological well-being, instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) and quality of life (QoL) in individuals with MCI, based on randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Design Systematic review and meta-analysis. Data sources Six English databases were systematically searched, including PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, American Psychological Association PsycInfo and Academic Search Premier. Eligibility criteria RCTs about CS for individuals with MCI, published between January 2003 and December 2024. Data extraction and synthesis Data were extracted and assessed using the revised Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomised trials by independent researchers. The meta-analysis was conducted using the standardised mean difference (SMD) and 95% CIs of the included studies. Results The meta-analysis included five eligible studies for the primary outcomes of cognitive function and three eligible studies for the secondary outcomes of psychological wellness. In the pooled samples, the CS intervention had a significant effect on cognitive function (SMD=0.63, 95% CI 0.25 to 1.01; p=0.001) and depression symptoms (SMD=-0.29, 95% CI -0.55 to -0.03; p=0.03) in individuals with MCI. However, no significant improvements in anxiety symptoms were identified after the CS intervention (SMD=-0.05; 95% CI -0.31 to 0.21; p=0.71). Conclusion The CS intervention can effectively improve cognitive function and alleviate depression symptoms. Although a meta-analysis was not conducted for IADL and QoL due to the limited number of included studies, positive trends in enhancing IADL performance and augmenting QoL were observed in individuals with MCI. However, due to the scarcity of relevant studies in this research field, more comprehensive RCTs are warranted to provide a better understanding of the potential benefits of CS and to guide its clinical application in the future. PROSPERO registration number CRD42023494685.
AB - Objective Cognitive stimulation (CS) is a non-pharmacological intervention aimed at enhancing cognitive function. However, the effectiveness of CS in individuals diagnosed with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) remains inconclusive. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the effectiveness of CS in improving cognitive function, psychological well-being, instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) and quality of life (QoL) in individuals with MCI, based on randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Design Systematic review and meta-analysis. Data sources Six English databases were systematically searched, including PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, American Psychological Association PsycInfo and Academic Search Premier. Eligibility criteria RCTs about CS for individuals with MCI, published between January 2003 and December 2024. Data extraction and synthesis Data were extracted and assessed using the revised Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomised trials by independent researchers. The meta-analysis was conducted using the standardised mean difference (SMD) and 95% CIs of the included studies. Results The meta-analysis included five eligible studies for the primary outcomes of cognitive function and three eligible studies for the secondary outcomes of psychological wellness. In the pooled samples, the CS intervention had a significant effect on cognitive function (SMD=0.63, 95% CI 0.25 to 1.01; p=0.001) and depression symptoms (SMD=-0.29, 95% CI -0.55 to -0.03; p=0.03) in individuals with MCI. However, no significant improvements in anxiety symptoms were identified after the CS intervention (SMD=-0.05; 95% CI -0.31 to 0.21; p=0.71). Conclusion The CS intervention can effectively improve cognitive function and alleviate depression symptoms. Although a meta-analysis was not conducted for IADL and QoL due to the limited number of included studies, positive trends in enhancing IADL performance and augmenting QoL were observed in individuals with MCI. However, due to the scarcity of relevant studies in this research field, more comprehensive RCTs are warranted to provide a better understanding of the potential benefits of CS and to guide its clinical application in the future. PROSPERO registration number CRD42023494685.
KW - GERIATRIC MEDICINE
KW - Randomized Controlled Trial
KW - REHABILITATION MEDICINE
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105008138487
U2 - 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-090767
DO - 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-090767
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 40499956
AN - SCOPUS:105008138487
SN - 2044-6055
VL - 15
JO - BMJ Open
JF - BMJ Open
IS - 6
M1 - e090767
ER -