Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

DRS2026 Editorial — Central but decentered: Repositioning the practitioner in design research involving practice

Research output: Chapter in book / Conference proceedingConference article published in proceeding or bookAcademic researchpeer-review

Abstract

Design research involving practice affords a unique mode of inquiry facilitated by acts of making, generative thinking, and iterative experimentation. The practitioner’s perspective is central because it foregrounds the significance of personal engagement with the research problem at hand. Current efforts in the field are nonetheless aiming to expand this inward-looking gaze by attending to the systemic and entangled dimensions of designing. With the increasing turn to relational, posthuman, and decolonial approaches towards that end, it becomes imperative to reconstrue what counts as ‘practice’ and reexamine whose perspectives are included in such a reconstrual. The present track brings together five contributions dealing with this issue, offering an array of theoretical, empirical, and methodological studies that illustrate how design research involving practice can fully account for the centrality of the practitioner’s perspective while also addressing the urgency to decenter it.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationDRS2026 Edinburgh
Subtitle of host publicationDesign Research Society International Conference
EditorsLuca Simeone, Colin M Gray, Arno Verhoeven, Amalia de Götzen, Yekta Bakırlıoğlu, Hadas Zohar, Michael Stead, Peter Buwert
Place of PublicationEdinburgh
Publisherthe Design Research Society
Pages1-7
Number of pages7
Edition2026
DOIs
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 8 Jun 2026

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'DRS2026 Editorial — Central but decentered: Repositioning the practitioner in design research involving practice'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this