Abstract
Design research involving practice affords a unique mode of inquiry facilitated by acts of making, generative thinking, and iterative experimentation. The practitioner’s perspective is central because it foregrounds the significance of personal engagement with the research problem at hand. Current efforts in the field are nonetheless aiming to expand this inward-looking gaze by attending to the systemic and entangled dimensions of designing. With the increasing turn to relational, posthuman, and decolonial approaches towards that end, it becomes imperative to reconstrue what counts as ‘practice’ and reexamine whose perspectives are included in such a reconstrual. The present track brings together five contributions dealing with this issue, offering an array of theoretical, empirical, and methodological studies that illustrate how design research involving practice can fully account for the centrality of the practitioner’s perspective while also addressing the urgency to decenter it.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | DRS2026 Edinburgh |
| Subtitle of host publication | Design Research Society International Conference |
| Editors | Luca Simeone, Colin M Gray, Arno Verhoeven, Amalia de Götzen, Yekta Bakırlıoğlu, Hadas Zohar, Michael Stead, Peter Buwert |
| Place of Publication | Edinburgh |
| Publisher | the Design Research Society |
| Pages | 1-7 |
| Number of pages | 7 |
| Edition | 2026 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Accepted/In press - 8 Jun 2026 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'DRS2026 Editorial — Central but decentered: Repositioning the practitioner in design research involving practice'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver