Does EigenPalm work? A system and evaluation perspective

King Hong Cheung; Adams Kong; Dapeng Zhang; Mohamed Kamel; Jia You

doi:10.1109/ICPR.2006.460

Does EigenPalm work? A system and evaluation perspective

King Hong Cheung, Adams Kong, Dapeng Zhang, Mohamed Kamel, Jia You

Research output: Journal article publication › Conference article › Academic research › peer-review

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Recently, there are keen interests in EigenPalm, which, collectively, refers to those methods that extract palmprint features directly from the appearance by means of Principal Component Analysis (PCA) for (dis)similarity matching. Encouraging results have been reported with the use of EigenPalm. However, we find a different story under a system and evaluation perspective. In this paper, we would like to introduce three issues that should be considered: the effects of templates from two different sessions, the effects of identical twins and the effects of unseen subjects. They are missing in the previous studies of EigenPalm.

Original language	English
Article number	1699874
Pages (from-to)	445-448
Number of pages	4
Journal	Proceedings - International Conference on Pattern Recognition
Volume	4
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1109/ICPR.2006.460
Publication status	Published - 1 Dec 2006
Event	18th International Conference on Pattern Recognition, ICPR 2006 - Hong Kong, Hong Kong Duration: 20 Aug 2006 → 24 Aug 2006

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

More information

10.1109/ICPR.2006.460

http://hdl.handle.net/10397/1185

Cite this

@article{8b4be1e0c4ec4d779082dbbb77592f37,

title = "Does EigenPalm work? A system and evaluation perspective",

abstract = "Recently, there are keen interests in EigenPalm, which, collectively, refers to those methods that extract palmprint features directly from the appearance by means of Principal Component Analysis (PCA) for (dis)similarity matching. Encouraging results have been reported with the use of EigenPalm. However, we find a different story under a system and evaluation perspective. In this paper, we would like to introduce three issues that should be considered: the effects of templates from two different sessions, the effects of identical twins and the effects of unseen subjects. They are missing in the previous studies of EigenPalm.",

author = "Cheung, {King Hong} and Adams Kong and Dapeng Zhang and Mohamed Kamel and Jia You",

year = "2006",

month = dec,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1109/ICPR.2006.460",

language = "English",

volume = "4",

pages = "445--448",

journal = "Proceedings - International Conference on Pattern Recognition",

issn = "1051-4651",

publisher = "IEEE",

note = "18th International Conference on Pattern Recognition, ICPR 2006 ; Conference date: 20-08-2006 Through 24-08-2006",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Does EigenPalm work? A system and evaluation perspective

AU - Cheung, King Hong

AU - Kong, Adams

AU - Zhang, Dapeng

AU - Kamel, Mohamed

AU - You, Jia

PY - 2006/12/1

Y1 - 2006/12/1

N2 - Recently, there are keen interests in EigenPalm, which, collectively, refers to those methods that extract palmprint features directly from the appearance by means of Principal Component Analysis (PCA) for (dis)similarity matching. Encouraging results have been reported with the use of EigenPalm. However, we find a different story under a system and evaluation perspective. In this paper, we would like to introduce three issues that should be considered: the effects of templates from two different sessions, the effects of identical twins and the effects of unseen subjects. They are missing in the previous studies of EigenPalm.

AB - Recently, there are keen interests in EigenPalm, which, collectively, refers to those methods that extract palmprint features directly from the appearance by means of Principal Component Analysis (PCA) for (dis)similarity matching. Encouraging results have been reported with the use of EigenPalm. However, we find a different story under a system and evaluation perspective. In this paper, we would like to introduce three issues that should be considered: the effects of templates from two different sessions, the effects of identical twins and the effects of unseen subjects. They are missing in the previous studies of EigenPalm.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34147175446&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1109/ICPR.2006.460

DO - 10.1109/ICPR.2006.460

M3 - Conference article

SN - 1051-4651

VL - 4

SP - 445

EP - 448

JO - Proceedings - International Conference on Pattern Recognition

JF - Proceedings - International Conference on Pattern Recognition

M1 - 1699874

T2 - 18th International Conference on Pattern Recognition, ICPR 2006

Y2 - 20 August 2006 through 24 August 2006

ER -

Does EigenPalm work? A system and evaluation perspective

Abstract

ASJC Scopus subject areas

More information

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this