Abstract
In initial position in English, the so-called voiced stop consonants are frequently not voiced whereas the unvoiced stops are always aspirated. This suggests that aspiration is a more dominantcue than voicing in the perceptual separation of these two classes of stops. The stops after word-initial s are neither voiced nor aspirated. We would expect, then, that they would be identified with the voiced stops. This expectation is fully supported by the results of a tape-splicing experiment involving listener judgment.
| Translated title of the contribution | The perception of stops after s |
|---|---|
| Original language | German |
| Pages (from-to) | 78-81 |
| Number of pages | 4 |
| Journal | Phonetica |
| Volume | 6 |
| Issue number | 1-2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Jan 1961 |
| Externally published | Yes |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Language and Linguistics
- Acoustics and Ultrasonics
- Linguistics and Language
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The perception of stops after s'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver