Diagnostic accuracy of tele-ophthalmology versus face-to-face consultation: abridged secondary publication

Kendrick Co Shih (Corresponding Author), JKW Wong, Jinxiao Lian, Lo Kuen Cindy Lam, Jimmy Shiu-ming Lai

Research output: Journal article publicationJournal articleAcademic researchpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Telemedicine is a viable care model during the COVID-19 pandemic. Tele-ophthalmology has
benefits in healthcare beyond the pandemic. Timely diagnosis and treatment of ocular diseases may prevent blindness. Tele-ophthalmology enables access to specialist health care services by underprivileged and disabled patients in areas with limited expertise. Nonetheless, tele-ophthalmology has been mostly used for screening a single disease
such as diabetic retinopathy. The accuracy of teleophthalmology for various diseases has not been established, although tele-ophthalmology and face-to-face consultation are comparable in terms of diagnostic outcomes. Previous studies of teleophthalmology are limited by the lack of robust clinical trials, small sample sizes, and absence of quality data, making assessment of economical and clinical benefits difficult.
This study aims to determine the diagnostic accuracy of tele-ophthalmology for cataracts,
glaucoma, and age-related macular degeneration (AMD), with face-to-face consultation as the gold standard, and to compare tele-ophthalmology with face-to-face consultation in terms of diagnosis, severity, and downstream costs.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)18-21
Number of pages4
JournalHong Kong Medical Journal
Volume29
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2023

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Diagnostic accuracy of tele-ophthalmology versus face-to-face consultation: abridged secondary publication'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this