Development of a questionnaire to measure the level of reflective thinking

David Kember, Doris Y.P. Leung, Alice Jones, Jean Tak Alice Loke Yuen, Jan McKay, Kit Sinclair, Harrison Tse, Celia Webb, Kam Yuet Wong, Marian Wong, Wai Ella Yeung

Research output: Journal article publicationReview articleAcademic researchpeer-review

292 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Many courses aim to promote reflective thinking or reflection upon practice, but there is a scarcity of readily usable instruments to determine whether students engage in reflective thinking and, if so, to what extent. This paper reports the development and testing of such an instrument. To ensure validity, the constructs measured were derived from the extensive literature on reflective thinking, particularly the writing of Mezirow. A combination of the literature review and initial testing led to the development of a four-scale instrument measuring four constructs; habitual action, understanding, reflection and critical reflection. The final version of the instrument was tested with a sample of 303 students from eight classes of a health science faculty. The reliability of the scales was established by acceptable Cronbach alpha values. Confirmatory factor analysis showed a good fit to the proposed four-factor structure. Comparison of mean scores between the eight classes showed predicted significant differences on each of the four scales between undergraduate and postgraduate students.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)381-395
Number of pages15
JournalAssessment and Evaluation in Higher Education
Volume25
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2000

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education

Cite this