TY - JOUR
T1 - Detailed assessment of GNSS observation noise based using zero baseline data
AU - Zhang, Huayi
AU - Ji, Shengyue
AU - Wang, Zhenjie
AU - Chen, Wu
N1 - Funding Information:
The research was substantially supported by Key Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 41631073), funded by Shenzhen Science and Technology Innovation Commission (Project No. JCYJ20170818104822282), Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province, China (Grant No. ZR2016DM15, ZR2016DQ01, ZR2017QD002 and ZR2017MD021), National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 41704021, 41701513 and 41604027), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Grant No. 18CX02064A and 16CX02026A) and Qingdao National Laboratory for Marine Science and Technology (Grant No. QNLM2016ORP0401). In addition, we would also like to acknowledge the Curtin GNSS Research Centre of Curtin University for their provided data sets.
Funding Information:
The research was substantially supported by Key Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 41631073 ), funded by Shenzhen Science and Technology Innovation Commission (Project No. JCYJ20170818104822282 ), Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province , China (Grant No. ZR2016DM15 , ZR2016DQ01 , ZR2017QD002 and ZR2017MD021 ), National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 41704021 , 41701513 and 41604027 ), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Grant No. 18CX02064A and 16CX02026A ) and Qingdao National Laboratory for Marine Science and Technology (Grant No. QNLM2016ORP0401 ). In addition, we would also like to acknowledge the Curtin GNSS Research Centre of Curtin University for their provided data sets.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 COSPAR
PY - 2018/11/1
Y1 - 2018/11/1
N2 - In this research, the GNSS observation noise is assessed in details based on zero baseline data. The 24-h observations are collected from two CORS stations of Curtin University (32.0°S, 115.9°E) on February 8, 2017. The code and carrier phase observation noise is assessed in details for every system of GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou, Galileo, SBAS and QZSS and for every measurement type and every satellite. In addition, the observation noise by two different kinds of receiver is also assessed and compared. From the numerical results, we find that: (1) Among the six GNSS systems, the code noise of Galileo is the smallest, the noise of all observed Galileo code types are no more than 0.1 m and the noise of C8X is only around 1 cm; the GLONASS code noise is the biggest, the noise of code types C1C and C2C are around 0.25 m; (2) The noise can vary greatly for different code measurement types and there is at least one code measurement type in each system with noise smaller than 0.1 m; (3) For carrier phase, Galileo noise is slightly smaller than the other systems, the noise of all carrier phase types are smaller than 1 mm; GLONASS noise is the biggest, the noise of L2C and L2P are all bigger than 1 mm, some can reach about 1.7 mm; (4) Generally, there is no obvious noise difference for different carrier phase measurement types of each system, except for GLONASS, of which the noise of frequency band L2 is obviously bigger than that of L1; (5) For BeiDou, MEO and IGSO have similar carrier phase noise level, but the noise of GEO is clearly related to elevation angle, with the decrease of elevation angle, the noise will increase; (6) The carrier phase noise of different kinds of receiver may vary greatly, in this research, the numerical results show that the noise of JAVAD receiver are generally much smaller than TRIMBLE.
AB - In this research, the GNSS observation noise is assessed in details based on zero baseline data. The 24-h observations are collected from two CORS stations of Curtin University (32.0°S, 115.9°E) on February 8, 2017. The code and carrier phase observation noise is assessed in details for every system of GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou, Galileo, SBAS and QZSS and for every measurement type and every satellite. In addition, the observation noise by two different kinds of receiver is also assessed and compared. From the numerical results, we find that: (1) Among the six GNSS systems, the code noise of Galileo is the smallest, the noise of all observed Galileo code types are no more than 0.1 m and the noise of C8X is only around 1 cm; the GLONASS code noise is the biggest, the noise of code types C1C and C2C are around 0.25 m; (2) The noise can vary greatly for different code measurement types and there is at least one code measurement type in each system with noise smaller than 0.1 m; (3) For carrier phase, Galileo noise is slightly smaller than the other systems, the noise of all carrier phase types are smaller than 1 mm; GLONASS noise is the biggest, the noise of L2C and L2P are all bigger than 1 mm, some can reach about 1.7 mm; (4) Generally, there is no obvious noise difference for different carrier phase measurement types of each system, except for GLONASS, of which the noise of frequency band L2 is obviously bigger than that of L1; (5) For BeiDou, MEO and IGSO have similar carrier phase noise level, but the noise of GEO is clearly related to elevation angle, with the decrease of elevation angle, the noise will increase; (6) The carrier phase noise of different kinds of receiver may vary greatly, in this research, the numerical results show that the noise of JAVAD receiver are generally much smaller than TRIMBLE.
KW - Carrier phase
KW - Code
KW - GNSS
KW - Observation noise
KW - Zero baseline
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85050920695&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.asr.2018.07.023
DO - 10.1016/j.asr.2018.07.023
M3 - Journal article
AN - SCOPUS:85050920695
SN - 0273-1177
VL - 62
SP - 2454
EP - 2466
JO - Advances in Space Research
JF - Advances in Space Research
IS - 9
ER -