TY - JOUR
T1 - DC Fault Analysis Models of Three Converter Topologies Considering Control Effects
AU - Li, Yujun
AU - Li, Jiapeng
AU - Wu, Guihong
AU - Xiong, Liansong
AU - Jia, Ke
AU - Xu, Zhao
N1 - Funding Information:
Manuscript received April 18, 2019; revised October 15, 2019; accepted November 13, 2019. Date of publication December 5, 2019; date of current version July 14, 2020. This work was supported in part by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant 51807150 and Grant 51707091, in part by the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation under Grant 2018M640989 and Grant 2019T120908, in part by the State Key Laboratory of Alternate Electrical Power System with Renewable Energy Sources under Grant LAPS19002, and in part by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities under Grant xjj2018006. (Corresponding author: Yujun Li.) Y. Li is with the School of Electrical Engineering, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, China, and also with the Department of Electrical Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Hong Kong (e-mail: [email protected]).
Publisher Copyright:
© 1982-2012 IEEE.
PY - 2020/11
Y1 - 2020/11
N2 - Existing converter models are normally reduced as simplified electrical components, whereas it overlooks the impacts of fast dynamics of converter current control loops. Therefore, the dc fault current calculation with the traditional simplified converter models becomes invalid when the simulation time is longer. To overcome this problem, this article incorporates the control effects of converters during the transient process and proposes three dc fault analysis models of classical three converter topologies for the high-voltage dc (HVdc) application including line communicated converter (LCC), two-level voltage-source converter (VSC), and modular multilevel converter (MMC). For an LCC-based rectifier, the nonlinear part of original model is first linearized with the least square method due to the large dc-link voltage deviation during dc fault, and the proportional integral (PI) current regulator with the reduced linearized model can be equivalent as an RC circuit for dc fault analysis. However, for two-level VSC or MMC, the dc-link voltage deviation does not drop that much with a large dc-link capacitor discharging process during transient dynamics. As a result, the original model is linearized relying on the small-signal method based on prefault operation points, and the dynamics of fast inner current loop with the linearized model can be represented as an RL circuit for dc fault current calculation. for dc fault analysis The proposed dc fault analysis models of three converters as equivalent RLC circuits are well testified under different fault resistances and dc reactors, control parameters, and operating conditions. Moreover, dc fault simulations of a hybrid HVdc system have verified the effectiveness of the proposed converter models.
AB - Existing converter models are normally reduced as simplified electrical components, whereas it overlooks the impacts of fast dynamics of converter current control loops. Therefore, the dc fault current calculation with the traditional simplified converter models becomes invalid when the simulation time is longer. To overcome this problem, this article incorporates the control effects of converters during the transient process and proposes three dc fault analysis models of classical three converter topologies for the high-voltage dc (HVdc) application including line communicated converter (LCC), two-level voltage-source converter (VSC), and modular multilevel converter (MMC). For an LCC-based rectifier, the nonlinear part of original model is first linearized with the least square method due to the large dc-link voltage deviation during dc fault, and the proportional integral (PI) current regulator with the reduced linearized model can be equivalent as an RC circuit for dc fault analysis. However, for two-level VSC or MMC, the dc-link voltage deviation does not drop that much with a large dc-link capacitor discharging process during transient dynamics. As a result, the original model is linearized relying on the small-signal method based on prefault operation points, and the dynamics of fast inner current loop with the linearized model can be represented as an RL circuit for dc fault current calculation. for dc fault analysis The proposed dc fault analysis models of three converters as equivalent RLC circuits are well testified under different fault resistances and dc reactors, control parameters, and operating conditions. Moreover, dc fault simulations of a hybrid HVdc system have verified the effectiveness of the proposed converter models.
KW - Converter model
KW - dc fault analysis
KW - least square method
KW - small-signal method
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85089212117&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/TIE.2019.2956376
DO - 10.1109/TIE.2019.2956376
M3 - Journal article
AN - SCOPUS:85089212117
SN - 0278-0046
VL - 67
SP - 9480
EP - 9491
JO - IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics
JF - IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics
IS - 11
M1 - 8924925
ER -