TY - JOUR
T1 - Damage-control design and hybrid tests of a full-scale two-story buckling-restrained braced steel moment frame with sliding gusset connections
AU - Zhao, Junxian
AU - Yan, Lijian
AU - Wang, Chen
AU - Zhou, Yun
AU - Chen, Ruobing
AU - Chan, Tak Ming
N1 - Funding Information:
This research is funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 51778244 and 52178481), Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation (Grant No. 2021B1515020057), and Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Modern Civil Engineering Technology (Grant No. 2021B1212040003).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2023/1/15
Y1 - 2023/1/15
N2 - Buckling-restrained braces (BRBs) are widely adopted as supplementary energy dissipation devices in steel moment frames (MFs) in Asia to improve the energy dissipation capacity of the whole system. Such systems are referred to as buckling-restrained braced moment frames (BRB-MFs). Nevertheless, adopting BRBs does not guarantee desirable seismic performance of the whole system, as frame action may cause premature fracture or buckling of BRB corner gusset connections, and such frame-to-gusset interaction may limit the ductility of such system. In our previous studies, a sliding corner gusset connection was proposed and proved to be able to substantially reduce the detrimental frame action at the connection level. In this paper, study was extended to (1) damage-control design of BRB-MFs with such connections in pursuit of enhanced system ductility, and (2) experimental evaluation on seismic behavior of BRB-MFs with such connections at the system level. The damage-control design method was first presented and a full-scale two-story BRB-MF designed by such procedure was experimentally studied under four levels of earthquake loading through hybrid tests, followed by a pseudo-static test to examine its failure mode. Test results showed that the sliding gusset connections effectively released the frame action at the system level. By adopting the damage-control design procedure, the test BRB-MF exhibited excellent seismic performance up to an inter-story drift ratio of ± 3 %, and plastic hinges of the MFs developed in the controlled positions without fracture or buckling under four levels of earthquake loading. With the improved ductility of MFs, BRBs achieved their full potential as energy dissipation devices.
AB - Buckling-restrained braces (BRBs) are widely adopted as supplementary energy dissipation devices in steel moment frames (MFs) in Asia to improve the energy dissipation capacity of the whole system. Such systems are referred to as buckling-restrained braced moment frames (BRB-MFs). Nevertheless, adopting BRBs does not guarantee desirable seismic performance of the whole system, as frame action may cause premature fracture or buckling of BRB corner gusset connections, and such frame-to-gusset interaction may limit the ductility of such system. In our previous studies, a sliding corner gusset connection was proposed and proved to be able to substantially reduce the detrimental frame action at the connection level. In this paper, study was extended to (1) damage-control design of BRB-MFs with such connections in pursuit of enhanced system ductility, and (2) experimental evaluation on seismic behavior of BRB-MFs with such connections at the system level. The damage-control design method was first presented and a full-scale two-story BRB-MF designed by such procedure was experimentally studied under four levels of earthquake loading through hybrid tests, followed by a pseudo-static test to examine its failure mode. Test results showed that the sliding gusset connections effectively released the frame action at the system level. By adopting the damage-control design procedure, the test BRB-MF exhibited excellent seismic performance up to an inter-story drift ratio of ± 3 %, and plastic hinges of the MFs developed in the controlled positions without fracture or buckling under four levels of earthquake loading. With the improved ductility of MFs, BRBs achieved their full potential as energy dissipation devices.
KW - Buckling-restrained brace
KW - Damage control
KW - Full-scale hybrid test
KW - Sliding gusset connection
KW - Steel moment frame
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85141922334&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.115263
DO - 10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.115263
M3 - Journal article
AN - SCOPUS:85141922334
SN - 0141-0296
VL - 275
JO - Structural Engineering Review
JF - Structural Engineering Review
M1 - 115263
ER -