Abstract
This paper tests a theory conjecturing that cross-listing can insulate firms from potential hostile takeovers owing to the increased cost concern of bidders. We find a significant and positive relation between the corporate control threat and the likelihood that firms cross-list in a foreign country. Firms facing takeover threats are more likely to choose hosting countries with greater accounting differences from the US GAAP. Subsample evidence suggests that cross-listing is more likely to be used as an antitakeover device if firms have foreign market exposure or when all-cash offers are less likely. Tests based on quasi-natural experiments provide further support.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 259-276 |
| Number of pages | 18 |
| Journal | Journal of Financial Economics |
| Volume | 145 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| Early online date | 10 Aug 2021 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Jul 2022 |
Keywords
- Cross-listing
- Poison pills
- Takeover deterrent
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Accounting
- Finance
- Economics and Econometrics
- Strategy and Management
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Cross-listings, antitakeover defenses, and the insulation hypothesis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver