Abstract
In the article by Li et al.1 cited above, the authors inadvertently mis-identified the type of MRI scanner used in the second sentence of section 2.E. The original sentence, "Three healthy volunteers were recruited to test the feasibility of our proposed method. MRI was performed using 3.0 Tesla human MRI scanner (Achieva TX, Philips Healthcare) with eight-channel head coil for signal reception." should read "Three healthy volunteers were recruited to test the feasibility of our proposed method. MRI was performed using 3.0 Tesla human MRI scanner (Achieva TX, Philips Healthcare) with eight-channel torso coil for signal reception." This change does not impact the results and conclusions of this article. The authors regret this error.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 2698 |
Number of pages | 1 |
Journal | Medical Physics |
Volume | 48 |
Issue number | 5 |
Early online date | 2 Mar 2021 |
DOIs |
|
Publication status | Published - May 2021 |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Biophysics
- Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging