Abstract
Research Question/Issue: Despite the importance of political ties to firm strategy and performance, little is known about why and how firms form political ties. This study examines how firm-specific governance structures function as important deter-minants of the formation of political ties and how the impact of governance struc-tures evolves during institutional transition of emerging economies.
Research Findings/Insights: Our empirical analysis is based on a longitudinal data set involving manually coded political ties of listed firms in Taiwan between 1996 and 2005. We find that business group affiliation and family ownership facilitate the for-mation of political ties but that such effects diminish as market infrastructures and regulatory institutions develop.
Theoretical/Academic Implications: This study systematically examines how corpo-rate governance structures affect the formation of political ties. It identifies an over-looked explanation for the dynamics of political ties that resides in the internal governance structures of firms. It contributes to the corporate governance research by demonstrating how governance structures other than the board of directors can provide resources to facilitate strategic actions such as political tie establishment. It also enriches research on corporate governance bundles by showing the interdependence among multilevel governance mechanisms in the context of political tie formation.
Practitioner/Policy Implications: This study offers insights for business executives interested in managing interdependence with government. While business group affiliates and family firms are better able to link to politicians, such advantages dimin-ish during institutional transition. Hence, group leaders and family owners should consider other political activities to effectively manage political risks as institutions develop.
Research Findings/Insights: Our empirical analysis is based on a longitudinal data set involving manually coded political ties of listed firms in Taiwan between 1996 and 2005. We find that business group affiliation and family ownership facilitate the for-mation of political ties but that such effects diminish as market infrastructures and regulatory institutions develop.
Theoretical/Academic Implications: This study systematically examines how corpo-rate governance structures affect the formation of political ties. It identifies an over-looked explanation for the dynamics of political ties that resides in the internal governance structures of firms. It contributes to the corporate governance research by demonstrating how governance structures other than the board of directors can provide resources to facilitate strategic actions such as political tie establishment. It also enriches research on corporate governance bundles by showing the interdependence among multilevel governance mechanisms in the context of political tie formation.
Practitioner/Policy Implications: This study offers insights for business executives interested in managing interdependence with government. While business group affiliates and family firms are better able to link to politicians, such advantages dimin-ish during institutional transition. Hence, group leaders and family owners should consider other political activities to effectively manage political risks as institutions develop.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Journal | Corporate Governance: An International Review |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Jul 2021 |
Externally published | Yes |