Abstract
At the same time that state departments of transportation are allowing contractor-performed quality control, they are also concerned about using the contractor-reported data for acceptance and payment purposes. The question is, are we putting the fox in charge of guarding the chickens? To address this concern, a large number of asphalt and concrete projects in Kentucky were examined. The statistical analyses showed that for the most part there is no significant difference between the contractor-performed acceptance data and concomitant highway agency-performed verification data. This is obviously a very encouraging finding that is expected to enhance the level of trust between the contractors and highway agencies.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 255-258 |
| Number of pages | 4 |
| Journal | Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice |
| Volume | 130 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Oct 2004 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Asphalts
- Contractors
- Kentucky
- Quality control
- State government
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Engineering (miscellaneous)
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Contractor-performed quality control: Is the fox guarding the henhouse?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver