Constrained anti-disturbance control for a quadrotor based on differential flatness

Research output: Journal article publicationJournal articleAcademic researchpeer-review

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The classical control design based on linearised model is widely used in practice even to those inherently nonlinear systems. Although linear design techniques are relatively mature and enjoy the simple structure in implementations, they can be prone to misbehaviour and failure when the system state is far away from the operating point. To avoid the drawbacks and exploit the advantages of linear design methods while tackling the system nonlinearity, a hybrid control structure is developed in this paper. First, the model predictive control is used to impose states and inputs constraints on the linearised model, which makes the linearisation satisfy the small-perturbation requirement and reduces the bound of linearisation error. On the other hand, a combination of disturbance observer-based control and H control, called composite hierarchical anti-disturbance control, is constructed for the linear model to provide robustness against multiple disturbances. The constrained reference states and inputs generated by the outer-loop model predictive controller are asymptotically tracked by the inner-loop composite anti-disturbance controller. To demonstrate the performance of the proposed framework, a case study on quadrotor is conducted.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1182-1193
Number of pages12
JournalInternational Journal of Systems Science
Volume48
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 26 Apr 2017

Keywords

  • composite anti-disturbance control
  • differential flatness
  • disturbance observer based control
  • Model predictive control
  • online optimisation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Control and Systems Engineering
  • Theoretical Computer Science
  • Computer Science Applications

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Constrained anti-disturbance control for a quadrotor based on differential flatness'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this