TY - GEN
T1 - Configuration Selection for Degradation Trajectory Prediction of Power Modules Based LSTM Model
AU - Zhang, Yichi
AU - Zhang, Yi
AU - Kong, Jie
AU - Liu, Jiahong
AU - Yao, Bo
AU - Wang, Huai
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 IEEE.
PY - 2025/10
Y1 - 2025/10
N2 - This paper investigates a data-driven approach for degradation trajectory prediction aimed at reducing reliability testing time, specifically employing iterative sequence-to-sequence prediction based on the long short-term memory (LSTM) model. It provides a comprehensive understanding of the application of the data-driven method to the scenarios analyzed and the related details, which involves data processing and the hyperparameter selection process. The degradation data support is from 18 samples under three test conditions in the power cycling test. The study considers the impact of different configurations (i.e., hyperparameters) of deep learning models on the prediction results, namely input/output features, the data down-sampling coefficient, the number of network layers, the number of hidden layer units, and the lengths of input and output sequences. Moreover, two indicators, the prediction accuracy and the degree of testing time reduction, are defined to quantify the prediction analysis performance. Finally, the sensitivity analysis quantifies the contribution of each of the six factors to both predicted performance metrics.
AB - This paper investigates a data-driven approach for degradation trajectory prediction aimed at reducing reliability testing time, specifically employing iterative sequence-to-sequence prediction based on the long short-term memory (LSTM) model. It provides a comprehensive understanding of the application of the data-driven method to the scenarios analyzed and the related details, which involves data processing and the hyperparameter selection process. The degradation data support is from 18 samples under three test conditions in the power cycling test. The study considers the impact of different configurations (i.e., hyperparameters) of deep learning models on the prediction results, namely input/output features, the data down-sampling coefficient, the number of network layers, the number of hidden layer units, and the lengths of input and output sequences. Moreover, two indicators, the prediction accuracy and the degree of testing time reduction, are defined to quantify the prediction analysis performance. Finally, the sensitivity analysis quantifies the contribution of each of the six factors to both predicted performance metrics.
KW - configuration
KW - degradation trajectory prediction
KW - long short-term memory model
KW - power cycling test
KW - power module
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105019979675
U2 - 10.1109/WiPDA-Asia63772.2025.11183974
DO - 10.1109/WiPDA-Asia63772.2025.11183974
M3 - Conference article published in proceeding or book
AN - SCOPUS:105019979675
T3 - 2025 IEEE Workshop on Wide Bandgap Power Devices and Applications in Asia, WiPDA Asia 2025
BT - 2025 IEEE Workshop on Wide Bandgap Power Devices and Applications in Asia, WiPDA Asia 2025
PB - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
T2 - 2025 IEEE Workshop on Wide Bandgap Power Devices and Applications in Asia, WiPDA Asia 2025
Y2 - 15 August 2025 through 17 August 2025
ER -