TY - GEN
T1 - Compression tests of aluminium alloy cross-sections
AU - Su, M. N.
AU - Young, B.
AU - Gardner, L.
PY - 2012/10/26
Y1 - 2012/10/26
N2 - Aluminium structural members are being used increasingly widely nowadays due to a range of advantageous characteristics such as high strength to weight ratio, good corrosion resistance, ease of fabrication and aesthetic appearance.A test program on aluminium Square Hollow Sections (SHS) and Rectangular Hollow Sections (RHS) as well as SHS and RHS with internal cross stiffeners was conducted. A total of nine stub columns with a wide range of cross-section slenderness were compressed between fixed ends. Two kinds of aluminium alloy, 6063-T5 and 6061-T6, were investigated. Material properties were determined by tensile coupon tests and hardness measurements. Significant strain hardening was observed for most of the columns. The test strengths obtained from this study, together with the previous test data conducted by other researchers, were compared with the design strengths predicted by the American, Australian/New Zealand and European specifications for aluminium structures. Furthermore, the test strengths were also compared with the strengths predicted using the deformation based Continuous Strength Method (CSM). The design strengths predicted by the three specifications were generally conservative for all columns. The Continuous Strength Method provides better predictions for aluminium alloy columns with stocky sections.
AB - Aluminium structural members are being used increasingly widely nowadays due to a range of advantageous characteristics such as high strength to weight ratio, good corrosion resistance, ease of fabrication and aesthetic appearance.A test program on aluminium Square Hollow Sections (SHS) and Rectangular Hollow Sections (RHS) as well as SHS and RHS with internal cross stiffeners was conducted. A total of nine stub columns with a wide range of cross-section slenderness were compressed between fixed ends. Two kinds of aluminium alloy, 6063-T5 and 6061-T6, were investigated. Material properties were determined by tensile coupon tests and hardness measurements. Significant strain hardening was observed for most of the columns. The test strengths obtained from this study, together with the previous test data conducted by other researchers, were compared with the design strengths predicted by the American, Australian/New Zealand and European specifications for aluminium structures. Furthermore, the test strengths were also compared with the strengths predicted using the deformation based Continuous Strength Method (CSM). The design strengths predicted by the three specifications were generally conservative for all columns. The Continuous Strength Method provides better predictions for aluminium alloy columns with stocky sections.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84867727702&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Conference article published in proceeding or book
AN - SCOPUS:84867727702
SN - 9780415621373
T3 - Tubular Structures XIV - Proceedings of the 14th International Symposium on Tubular Structures, ISTS 2012
SP - 501
EP - 508
BT - Tubular Structures XIV - Proceedings of the 14th International Symposium on Tubular Structures, ISTS 2012
T2 - 14th International Symposium on Tubular Structures, ISTS 2012
Y2 - 12 September 2012 through 14 September 2012
ER -