Comparison of bone microstructure and strength in the distal radius and tibia between the different types of primary hypertrophic osteoarthropathy: an HR-pQCT study

Qianqian Pang, Yuping Xu, Ruoxi Liao, Ye Li, Li Zhang, Yue Chi, Xuan Qi, Mei Li, Yan Jiang, Ou Wang, Xiaoping Xing, Ling Qin (Corresponding Author), Weibo Xia (Corresponding Author)

Research output: Journal article publicationJournal articleAcademic researchpeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Summary: Primary hypertrophic osteoarthropathy (PHO) is a hereditary bone disease that is grouped into PHO autosomal recessive 1 (PHOAR1) and PHO autosomal recessive 2 (PHOAR2) due to different causative genes. Data comparing bone microstructure between the two subtypes are scarce. This is the first study to find that PHOAR1 patients had inferior bone microstructure compared with PHOAR2 patients. Purpose: The primary goal of this study was to assess bone microarchitecture and strength in PHOAR1 and PHOAR2 patients and to compare them with age- and sex-matched healthy controls (HCs). The secondary goal was to assess the differences between PHOAR1 and PHOAR2 patients. Methods: Twenty-seven male Chinese PHO patients (PHOAR1 = 7; PHOAR2 = 20) were recruited from Peking Union Medical College Hospital. The areal bone mineral density (aBMD) was assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Peripheral bone microarchitecture at the distal radius and tibia were evaluated by high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT). Biochemical markers of PGE2, bone turnover, and Dickkopf-1 (DKK1) were investigated. Results: Compared with HCs, PHOAR1 and PHOAR2 patients had distinctively larger bone geometry, substantially lower vBMD at the radius and tibia, and compromised cortical microstructure at the radius. For trabecular bone, PHOAR1 and PHOAR2 patients showed different changes at the tibia. PHOAR1 patients had significant deficits in the trabecular compartment, resulting in lower estimated bone strength. Conversely, PHOAR2 patients showed a higher trabecular number, narrower trabecular separation, and lower trabecular network inhomogeneity than HCs, translating into preserved or slightly high estimated bone strength. Conclusion: PHOAR1 patients had inferior bone microstructure and strength compared with PHOAR2 patients and HCs. Additionally, this study was the first to find differences in the bone microstructure between PHOAR1 and PHOAR2 patients.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1453-1464
Number of pages12
JournalOsteoporosis International
Volume34
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 18 May 2023
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • DKK1
  • HR-pQCT
  • PHO
  • PHOAR1
  • PHOAR2

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of bone microstructure and strength in the distal radius and tibia between the different types of primary hypertrophic osteoarthropathy: an HR-pQCT study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this