TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparison of aerodynamic performance of moving train model at bridge–tunnel section in wind tunnel with or without tunnel portal
AU - Ouyang, Dehui
AU - Yang, Weichao
AU - Deng, E.
AU - Wang, Youwu
AU - He, Xuhui
AU - Tang, Linbo
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China [grant numbers 51978670 and U1934209 ], the National Outstanding Youth Science Fund Project of National Natural Science Foundation of China [grant number 51925808 ], the Research Grants Council, University Grants Committee of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (SAR), China [grant number R-5020-18 ], the Innovation and Technology Commission of the Hong Kong SAR Government [grant number K-BBY1 ] and The Hong Kong Polytechnic University's Postdoc Matching Fund Scheme [grant number 1-W21Q]. The numerical calculations in this paper have been done on Hefei advanced computing center.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2023/5
Y1 - 2023/5
N2 - The moving train model test for wind tunnels is an advanced and effective research method for studying the aerodynamic effect of trains passing through tunnel portals in crosswind environments. However, the modelling of tunnel portal structures is cumbersome, and its influence on test results remains unclear. Here, the influence law of the presence and absence of a tunnel portal on the aerodynamic performance of a train was investigated via a wind tunnel test and an improved delayed eddy simulation turbulence model with “mosaic” mesh technology. First, the difference between train locomotion on the windward and leeward side lines with and without a portal was compared from the perspectives of aerodynamic load amplitude, power spectral density (PSD), and standard deviation. Second, the influence of vehicle speed on the amplitude of the train's aerodynamic load was studied, and the recommended critical speed was determined. Finally, the applicability of the moving model test results under different scale ratios (Reynolds numbers) was explored. Key results show that the aerodynamic load amplitude, PSD peak and standard deviation of the train on the leeward side line are generally higher than those on the windward side line. As indicated by the lift force in the ‘EX’ process without the tunnel portal, the amplitude on the leeward side line is 1.73 time the corresponding values on the windward side line. At speeds of 6, 12 and 18 m/s, when the moving train model speed reaches 12 m/s, the influence of the tunnel portal on the aerodynamic load amplitude can be ignored. The results imply a serious distortion of the aerodynamic load amplitude for the 1:20 model scale, whereas it appears to be appropriate at the 1:16.8 and 1:10 scales. The model test with a Reynolds number of 2.67 × 105 offers an ideal reference value for real trains.
AB - The moving train model test for wind tunnels is an advanced and effective research method for studying the aerodynamic effect of trains passing through tunnel portals in crosswind environments. However, the modelling of tunnel portal structures is cumbersome, and its influence on test results remains unclear. Here, the influence law of the presence and absence of a tunnel portal on the aerodynamic performance of a train was investigated via a wind tunnel test and an improved delayed eddy simulation turbulence model with “mosaic” mesh technology. First, the difference between train locomotion on the windward and leeward side lines with and without a portal was compared from the perspectives of aerodynamic load amplitude, power spectral density (PSD), and standard deviation. Second, the influence of vehicle speed on the amplitude of the train's aerodynamic load was studied, and the recommended critical speed was determined. Finally, the applicability of the moving model test results under different scale ratios (Reynolds numbers) was explored. Key results show that the aerodynamic load amplitude, PSD peak and standard deviation of the train on the leeward side line are generally higher than those on the windward side line. As indicated by the lift force in the ‘EX’ process without the tunnel portal, the amplitude on the leeward side line is 1.73 time the corresponding values on the windward side line. At speeds of 6, 12 and 18 m/s, when the moving train model speed reaches 12 m/s, the influence of the tunnel portal on the aerodynamic load amplitude can be ignored. The results imply a serious distortion of the aerodynamic load amplitude for the 1:20 model scale, whereas it appears to be appropriate at the 1:16.8 and 1:10 scales. The model test with a Reynolds number of 2.67 × 105 offers an ideal reference value for real trains.
KW - Aerodynamic performance
KW - Improved delayed detached eddy simulation
KW - Moving train model
KW - Tunnel portal
KW - Wind tunnel test
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85147605190&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.tust.2023.105030
DO - 10.1016/j.tust.2023.105030
M3 - Journal article
AN - SCOPUS:85147605190
SN - 0886-7798
VL - 135
JO - Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology
JF - Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology
M1 - 105030
ER -