TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparison and analysis of drainage measures for draining accumulated water condensed from wet CBM and transported in surface gathering pipeline network
AU - He, Guoxi
AU - Tang, Dongdong
AU - Yin, Binbin
AU - Sun, Liying
AU - Ding, Dingqian
AU - Liang, Yongtu
AU - Liao, Kexi
N1 - Funding Information:
This work is part of the program “Study on the mechanism of complex heat and mass transfer during batch transport process in products pipelines”, which is funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China . Its grant number is 51474228 . The work is also part of the Program “Study on the Coalbed Methane Surface Project System Optimization and Operation Control” funded by the Fundamental Research Plan of Shanxi, China . Grant number is 2014012012 . The authors are grateful to all study participants.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2018/8
Y1 - 2018/8
N2 - When compared with conventional gas field development, the coalbed methane (CBM) production process has its unique features that the produced natural gas contains saturated vapor and the gathering system is characterized as two-phase flow and liquid drainage. This paper aims to compare the drainage measures for draining liquid that condenses from wet CBM and transported in surficial gathering pipeline network. The unsteady non-fully developed flow of wet CBM in dendritic gathering and transmission pipeline network was simulated and analyzed. Phase change of water vapor was presented during the low-liquid loading flow and heat transfer process. The mass flow rate in pipeline network was supposed to increase continuously due to the aggregation and accumulation of liquid. The pressure at some adjacent nodes was validated by experimental data in situ. Three measurements for draining liquid are proposed, which include pigging, installing devices and cooling fluid at pipe inlet. It is concluded that the optimal strategy is combining the pigging method with installing several drainage devices rather than only pigging or the combination of pigging and cooling. Additionally, the presented model is a worthy way to optimize the pigging cycle to ensure the high efficient operation for the pipeline. Therefore, this paper provides a safe and economic method for the flow assurance of wet CBM fields.
AB - When compared with conventional gas field development, the coalbed methane (CBM) production process has its unique features that the produced natural gas contains saturated vapor and the gathering system is characterized as two-phase flow and liquid drainage. This paper aims to compare the drainage measures for draining liquid that condenses from wet CBM and transported in surficial gathering pipeline network. The unsteady non-fully developed flow of wet CBM in dendritic gathering and transmission pipeline network was simulated and analyzed. Phase change of water vapor was presented during the low-liquid loading flow and heat transfer process. The mass flow rate in pipeline network was supposed to increase continuously due to the aggregation and accumulation of liquid. The pressure at some adjacent nodes was validated by experimental data in situ. Three measurements for draining liquid are proposed, which include pigging, installing devices and cooling fluid at pipe inlet. It is concluded that the optimal strategy is combining the pigging method with installing several drainage devices rather than only pigging or the combination of pigging and cooling. Additionally, the presented model is a worthy way to optimize the pigging cycle to ensure the high efficient operation for the pipeline. Therefore, this paper provides a safe and economic method for the flow assurance of wet CBM fields.
KW - Dendritic CBM gathering pipeline network
KW - Drainage measures
KW - Liquid accumulation
KW - Non-fully developed flow
KW - Phase change of vapor
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85048299263&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jngse.2018.06.017
DO - 10.1016/j.jngse.2018.06.017
M3 - Journal article
AN - SCOPUS:85048299263
SN - 1875-5100
VL - 56
SP - 281
EP - 298
JO - Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering
JF - Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering
ER -