TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparative numerical study on focusing wave interaction with FPSO-like structure
AU - Yan, Shiqiang
AU - Li, Qian
AU - Wang, Jinghua
AU - Ma, Qingwei
AU - Xie, Zhihua
AU - Stoesser, Thorsten
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors at City, University of London gratefully acknowledge the financial support of EPSRC projects (EP/M022382, EP/N006569, and EP/N008863) and UKIERI-DST project (DST-UKIERI-2016-17-0029). The authors at Cardiff University and University College London acknowledge the support of EPSRC projects (EP/K041169/1 and EP/R022135/1).
Publisher Copyright:
© The International Society of Offshore and Polar Engineers.
PY - 2019/6
Y1 - 2019/6
N2 - Evaluating the interactions between offshore structures and extreme waves plays an essential role for securing the survivabilityof the structures. For this purpose, various numerical tools—for example, the fully nonlinear potential theory (FNPT),the Navier–Stokes (NS) models, and hybrid approaches combining different numerical models—have been developed andemployed. However, there is still great uncertainty over the required level of model fidelity when being applied to a widerange of wave-structure interaction problems. This paper aims to shed some light on this issue with a specific focus on theoverall error sourced from wave generation/absorbing techniques and resolving the viscous and turbulent effects, by comparingthe performances of three different models, including the quasi-arbitrary Lagrangian Eulerian finite element method(QALE-FEM) based on the FNPT, an in-house two-phase NS model with large-eddy simulation and a hybrid model couplingthe QALE-FEM with the OpenFOAM/InterDymFoam, in the cases with a fixed FPSO-like structure under extreme focusingwaves. The relative errors of numerical models are defined against the experimental data, which are released after thenumerical works have been completed (i.e., a blind test), in terms of the pressure and wave elevations. This paper providesa practical reference for not only choosing an appropriate model in practices but also on developing/optimizing numericaltools for more reliable and robust predications.
AB - Evaluating the interactions between offshore structures and extreme waves plays an essential role for securing the survivabilityof the structures. For this purpose, various numerical tools—for example, the fully nonlinear potential theory (FNPT),the Navier–Stokes (NS) models, and hybrid approaches combining different numerical models—have been developed andemployed. However, there is still great uncertainty over the required level of model fidelity when being applied to a widerange of wave-structure interaction problems. This paper aims to shed some light on this issue with a specific focus on theoverall error sourced from wave generation/absorbing techniques and resolving the viscous and turbulent effects, by comparingthe performances of three different models, including the quasi-arbitrary Lagrangian Eulerian finite element method(QALE-FEM) based on the FNPT, an in-house two-phase NS model with large-eddy simulation and a hybrid model couplingthe QALE-FEM with the OpenFOAM/InterDymFoam, in the cases with a fixed FPSO-like structure under extreme focusingwaves. The relative errors of numerical models are defined against the experimental data, which are released after thenumerical works have been completed (i.e., a blind test), in terms of the pressure and wave elevations. This paper providesa practical reference for not only choosing an appropriate model in practices but also on developing/optimizing numericaltools for more reliable and robust predications.
KW - Blind test
KW - Comparative study
KW - FNPT
KW - LES
KW - NS models
KW - Wave-structure interaction
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85068921305&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.17736/ijope.2019.jc754
DO - 10.17736/ijope.2019.jc754
M3 - Journal article
AN - SCOPUS:85068921305
SN - 1053-5381
VL - 29
SP - 149
EP - 157
JO - International Journal of Offshore and Polar Engineering
JF - International Journal of Offshore and Polar Engineering
IS - 2
ER -