Co-Pyrolysis of biomass and plastic waste: Process prediction and optimization based on Artificial Intelligence and response optimizer surrogate model

Co-pyrolysis process prediction and optimization has been done through different artificial intelligence processes and response optimizer surrogate model. Neural network and machine learning-based different prediction models have been evaluated to predict the co-pyrolysis output based on the experimental data from literature. While multi-objective optimization has been done through response optimizer. According to prediction models results, CatBoost Regressor (CatB) and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGB) models’ performance is better than other (seven) models with CatB co-efficient of determinant (R²) 0.92–0.98 while it is 0.91–0.98 for XGB in different scenarios. Therefore, CatB and XGB both models can provide an optimal result for co-pyrolysis prediction. Surrogate-model for multi-objective optimization results concluded that lower portion of biomass waste and higher plastic waste in the feedstock has the optimum co-pyrolysis process output around 550 °C and 60 min of resident time for higher portion of liquid yield with lower gases production. Overall higher portion of the plastic waste in feedstock at high temperature and low resident time promotes more liquid yield. While solid (biochar) production is optimal when there is a higher amount of biomass waste in the feedstock at lower temperature, and longer resident time.