Ground-penetrating radar (GPR) has been extensively studied for condition assessment of concrete bridge decks in North America. Although several methods for analyzing GPR data have been proposed, the commonly accepted method evaluates the condition of concrete bridge decks on the basis of the difference between reflection amplitudes of the top rebar layer. It is assumed in the method that strong reflection indicates sound concrete, whereas the area with high-amplitude attenuation is associated with concrete corrosion. The final result is a contour map of reflection amplitude in decibel scale with the thresholds selected arbitrarily to define the severity of concrete deterioration. Because subjective determination of threshold values may lead to inconsistency in the result obtained, this paper proposes a robust method for resolving that issue. Specifically, after depth correction was performed for top rebar amplitudes, on the basis of K-means clustering technique these amplitude data were grouped into a number of condition categories. Through two case studies in North America, the methodology was implemented and compared with the results provided by other technologies, namely, concrete resistivity, half-cell potential, and laboratory chloride content analysis. The implementation showed that while the proposed method was simple to employ, it still provided reasonable results that were in line with the outputs provided by the other techniques.
|Number of pages||9|
|Journal||Transportation Research Record|
|Publication status||Published - 1 Jan 2015|
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Civil and Structural Engineering
- Mechanical Engineering