Abstract
Background: Despite uncertainty regarding the benefits of prostate cancer screening, many men have had a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test. Purpose: This study aims to identify classes of reasons guiding men's decisions about prostate cancer screening and predict reasoning approaches by family history and prior screening behaviour. Methods: First-degree relatives of men with prostate cancer (n = 207) and men from the general population (n = 239) of Australia listed reasons they considered when deciding whether to have a PSA test. Results: Responses were coded into 31 distinct categories. Latent class analysis identified three classes. The evaluation of risk information cues class (20.9 %) contained a greater number of men with a family history (compared with control and overcome cancer/risk class; 52.7 %). Informed decisions and health system class (26.5 %) included a lower proportion of men who had had a PSA test and greater proportions of highly educated and married men. Conclusion: Understanding the reasons underlying men's screening decisions may lead to a more effective information provision and decision support.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 322-335 |
| Number of pages | 14 |
| Journal | Annals of Behavioral Medicine |
| Volume | 46 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Dec 2013 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Keywords
- Decision making
- Family history
- PSA test
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- General Psychology
- Psychiatry and Mental health
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Classifying the reasons men consider to be important in prostate-specific antigen (psa) testing decisions: Evaluating risks, lay beliefs, and informed decisions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver