TY - JOUR
T1 - Childhood Emotional Maltreatment and Adulthood Romantic Relationship Well-Being
T2 - A Multilevel, Meta-Analytic Review
AU - Cao, Hongjian
AU - Ma, Rongzi
AU - Li, Xiaomin
AU - Liang, Yue
AU - Wu, Qinglu
AU - Chi, Peilian
AU - Li, Jian Bin
AU - Zhou, Nan
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors would like to greatly thank Dr. Junhui Wu, who is working as a research fellow at the Faculty of Psychology, Beijing Normal University, for her helpful suggestions for statistical analyses. The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: Preparation of this article was supported by (a) the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31700966) and (b) the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, China (2019NTSS04 and 2018NTSS06).
Funding Information:
The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: Preparation of this article was supported by (a) the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31700966) and (b) the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, China (2019NTSS04 and 2018NTSS06).
Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2020.
PY - 2022/7
Y1 - 2022/7
N2 - During the past decade, research on the link between childhood emotional maltreatment and adulthood romantic relationship well-being has been accumulating, but there still lacks a systematic, quantitative evaluation of existing research. This three-level, meta-analysis aimed to fill this gap. Reports were included if they examined the link between early emotional maltreatment and adulthood romantic relationship well-being, presented statistics needed to calculate at least one bivariate effect size, written in English, and published/written before January 1, 2020. We retrieved 201 effect sizes from 23 reports. Early emotional maltreatment (aggregated across forms) was negatively (yet modestly) associated with later romantic relationship well-being (aggregated across dimensions; r = −.143, 95% confidence interval [−.173, −.114], p <.001). This association did not vary as a function of maltreatment form but differed across relationship well-being dimensions, such that the effect was stronger for the negative than for the positive relationship outcomes. We also found that (a) the actor effect was larger than the partner effect, (b) the effect was stronger in studies using Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (CTQ) than in studies not using CTQ, (c) whether using established measures of relationship well-being did not alter the effect, (d) the absolute magnitude of effect was negatively associated with methodological rigor of effect, and (e) the effect did not vary as functions of publication type, whether the sample was a college student sample, or union status, and was not related to the mean of union duration. Last, the limitations of existing research, avenues for future inquiries, and implications for practice were noted.
AB - During the past decade, research on the link between childhood emotional maltreatment and adulthood romantic relationship well-being has been accumulating, but there still lacks a systematic, quantitative evaluation of existing research. This three-level, meta-analysis aimed to fill this gap. Reports were included if they examined the link between early emotional maltreatment and adulthood romantic relationship well-being, presented statistics needed to calculate at least one bivariate effect size, written in English, and published/written before January 1, 2020. We retrieved 201 effect sizes from 23 reports. Early emotional maltreatment (aggregated across forms) was negatively (yet modestly) associated with later romantic relationship well-being (aggregated across dimensions; r = −.143, 95% confidence interval [−.173, −.114], p <.001). This association did not vary as a function of maltreatment form but differed across relationship well-being dimensions, such that the effect was stronger for the negative than for the positive relationship outcomes. We also found that (a) the actor effect was larger than the partner effect, (b) the effect was stronger in studies using Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (CTQ) than in studies not using CTQ, (c) whether using established measures of relationship well-being did not alter the effect, (d) the absolute magnitude of effect was negatively associated with methodological rigor of effect, and (e) the effect did not vary as functions of publication type, whether the sample was a college student sample, or union status, and was not related to the mean of union duration. Last, the limitations of existing research, avenues for future inquiries, and implications for practice were noted.
KW - childhood emotional maltreatment
KW - emotional abuse
KW - emotional neglect
KW - meta-analysis
KW - romantic relationship well-being
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85097047003&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/1524838020975895
DO - 10.1177/1524838020975895
M3 - Review article
C2 - 33267741
AN - SCOPUS:85097047003
SN - 1524-8380
VL - 23
SP - 778
EP - 794
JO - Trauma, Violence, and Abuse
JF - Trauma, Violence, and Abuse
IS - 3
ER -