TY - JOUR
T1 - Birth weight and blood pressure: 'J' shape or linear shape? Findings from a cross-sectional study in Hong Kong Chinese women
AU - Xie, Yaojie
AU - Ho, Suzanne C.
AU - Liu, Zhao Min
AU - Hui, Stanley Sai Chuen
PY - 2014/1/1
Y1 - 2014/1/1
N2 - Objectives: To investigate the association between birth weight and blood pressure (BP) and to determine the effect of body size change from birth to adulthood on BP. Design: A cross-sectional design to collect retrospective data. Participants: 1253 female nurses aged 35-65 years in Hong Kong. Main outcome measures: Birth weight, height, weight, BP, waist circumference, demographics and lifestyle factors were collected by a self-administered questionnaire through mail survey. These self-reported variables have been validated in a pilot study. The conditional relative weight (CRW), which was calculated as a residual of current weight regressed on birth weight, was used to express higher or lower relative weight gain from birth to adulthood. Results: No significant linear association between overall range of birth weight and BP was found. The curve estimation showed a significant quadratic curvilinear association ('J' shape). In the piecewiselinear analysis, a significant inverse association between birth weight z-scores and BP was observed in the birth weight ≤3.1 kg group (systolic BP (SBP): coefficient B=-1.73, 95% CI -3.17 to -0.30; diastolic BP (DBP): B=-1.12, 95% CI -2.19 to -0.06). A positive but nonsignificant association occurred in the birth weight >3.1 kg group. Participants who belonged to the lowest 10% birth weight category but at the current top 10% BMI group had higher BP than participants in other BMI groups. The CRW z-score was positively associated with BP (coefficient B: 4.18 for SBP and 2.87 for DBP). Conclusions: Unlike most previous studies, we found a 'J' shape association rather than a linear association between birth weight and BP. Women with large percentile crossing of body size from birth to adulthood were more likely to have elevated BP. A higher weight gain from birth to adulthood than expected led to higher BP.
AB - Objectives: To investigate the association between birth weight and blood pressure (BP) and to determine the effect of body size change from birth to adulthood on BP. Design: A cross-sectional design to collect retrospective data. Participants: 1253 female nurses aged 35-65 years in Hong Kong. Main outcome measures: Birth weight, height, weight, BP, waist circumference, demographics and lifestyle factors were collected by a self-administered questionnaire through mail survey. These self-reported variables have been validated in a pilot study. The conditional relative weight (CRW), which was calculated as a residual of current weight regressed on birth weight, was used to express higher or lower relative weight gain from birth to adulthood. Results: No significant linear association between overall range of birth weight and BP was found. The curve estimation showed a significant quadratic curvilinear association ('J' shape). In the piecewiselinear analysis, a significant inverse association between birth weight z-scores and BP was observed in the birth weight ≤3.1 kg group (systolic BP (SBP): coefficient B=-1.73, 95% CI -3.17 to -0.30; diastolic BP (DBP): B=-1.12, 95% CI -2.19 to -0.06). A positive but nonsignificant association occurred in the birth weight >3.1 kg group. Participants who belonged to the lowest 10% birth weight category but at the current top 10% BMI group had higher BP than participants in other BMI groups. The CRW z-score was positively associated with BP (coefficient B: 4.18 for SBP and 2.87 for DBP). Conclusions: Unlike most previous studies, we found a 'J' shape association rather than a linear association between birth weight and BP. Women with large percentile crossing of body size from birth to adulthood were more likely to have elevated BP. A higher weight gain from birth to adulthood than expected led to higher BP.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84929938822&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005115
DO - 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005115
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 25200558
SN - 2044-6055
VL - 4
JO - BMJ Open
JF - BMJ Open
M1 - e005115
ER -