Authorship trends and collaboration patterns in business ethics literature

Mehmet Ali Koseoglu; Mehmet Yildiz; Taha Ciftci

doi:10.1111/beer.12177

Authorship trends and collaboration patterns in business ethics literature

Mehmet Ali Koseoglu, Mehmet Yildiz, Taha Ciftci

Research output: Journal article publication › Journal article › Academic research › peer-review

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The primary aim of this study is to clarify the authorship trends, collaboration patterns, and impact factors in business ethics literature by looking at articles published between 1960 and 2015 in four leading business ethics journals: Business and Society, Business Ethics: A European Review, Business Ethics Quarterly, and the Journal of Business Ethics. This study showed the growth type of business ethics literature, authorship trends, collaboration patterns, authors' productivity evolved by subperiods and journals, and authors' dominance factor by subperiods and journals. After providing an evaluation of the results of the study, the authors discuss the study's limitations and suggestions for future research.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	164-177
Number of pages	14
Journal	Business Ethics
Volume	27
Issue number	2
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12177
Publication status	Published - 1 Apr 2018

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Business and International Management
Economics and Econometrics

More information

10.1111/beer.12177

Cite this

@article{62dbcc3c6e85455ead3bcb174857bcd2,

title = "Authorship trends and collaboration patterns in business ethics literature",

abstract = "The primary aim of this study is to clarify the authorship trends, collaboration patterns, and impact factors in business ethics literature by looking at articles published between 1960 and 2015 in four leading business ethics journals: Business and Society, Business Ethics: A European Review, Business Ethics Quarterly, and the Journal of Business Ethics. This study showed the growth type of business ethics literature, authorship trends, collaboration patterns, authors' productivity evolved by subperiods and journals, and authors' dominance factor by subperiods and journals. After providing an evaluation of the results of the study, the authors discuss the study's limitations and suggestions for future research.",

author = "Koseoglu, {Mehmet Ali} and Mehmet Yildiz and Taha Ciftci",

year = "2018",

month = apr,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1111/beer.12177",

language = "English",

volume = "27",

pages = "164--177",

journal = "Business Ethics",

issn = "0962-8770",

publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd",

number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Authorship trends and collaboration patterns in business ethics literature

AU - Koseoglu, Mehmet Ali

AU - Yildiz, Mehmet

AU - Ciftci, Taha

PY - 2018/4/1

Y1 - 2018/4/1

N2 - The primary aim of this study is to clarify the authorship trends, collaboration patterns, and impact factors in business ethics literature by looking at articles published between 1960 and 2015 in four leading business ethics journals: Business and Society, Business Ethics: A European Review, Business Ethics Quarterly, and the Journal of Business Ethics. This study showed the growth type of business ethics literature, authorship trends, collaboration patterns, authors' productivity evolved by subperiods and journals, and authors' dominance factor by subperiods and journals. After providing an evaluation of the results of the study, the authors discuss the study's limitations and suggestions for future research.

AB - The primary aim of this study is to clarify the authorship trends, collaboration patterns, and impact factors in business ethics literature by looking at articles published between 1960 and 2015 in four leading business ethics journals: Business and Society, Business Ethics: A European Review, Business Ethics Quarterly, and the Journal of Business Ethics. This study showed the growth type of business ethics literature, authorship trends, collaboration patterns, authors' productivity evolved by subperiods and journals, and authors' dominance factor by subperiods and journals. After providing an evaluation of the results of the study, the authors discuss the study's limitations and suggestions for future research.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85038818834&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/beer.12177

DO - 10.1111/beer.12177

M3 - Journal article

SN - 0962-8770

VL - 27

SP - 164

EP - 177

JO - Business Ethics

JF - Business Ethics

IS - 2

ER -

Authorship trends and collaboration patterns in business ethics literature

Abstract

ASJC Scopus subject areas

More information

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this