Attending community-based lung cancer screening influences smoking behaviour in deprived populations

Haval Balata, Liam Traverse-Healy, Sean Blandin-Knight, Christopher Armitage, Philip Barber, Denis Colligan, Peter Elton, Marie Kirwan, Judith Lyons, Lorna McWilliams, Juliette Novasio, Anna Sharman, Kathryn Slevin, Sarah Taylor, Janet Tonge, Sara Waplington, Janelle Yorke, Matthew Evison, Richard Booton, Philip A.J. Crosbie

Research output: Journal article publicationJournal articleAcademic researchpeer-review

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: The impact of lung cancer screening on smoking is unclear, especially in deprived populations who are underrepresented in screening trials. The aim of this observational cohort study was to investigate whether a community-based lung cancer screening programme influenced smoking behaviour and smoking attitude in socio-economically deprived populations. Material and Methods: Ever-smokers, age 55–74, registered at participating General Practices were invited to a community-based Lung Health Check (LHC). This included an assessment of respiratory symptoms, lung cancer risk (PLCOm2012), spirometry and signposting to stop smoking services. Those at high risk (PLCOM2012≥1.51%) were offered annual low-dose CT screening over two rounds. Self-reported smoking status and behaviour were recorded at the LHC and again 12 months later, when attitudes to smoking were also assessed. Results: 919 participants (51% women) were included in the analysis (77% of attendees); median deprivation rank in the lowest decile for England. At baseline 50.3% were current smokers. One-year quit rate was 10.2%, quitting was associated with increased baseline symptoms (adjOR 2.62, 95% CI 1.07–6.41; p = 0.035) but not demographics or screening results. 55% attributed quitting to the LHC. In current smokers, 44% reported the LHC had made them consider stopping, 29% it made them try to stop and 25% made them smoke less whilst only 1.7% and 0.7% said it made them worry less about smoking or think it acceptable to smoke. Conclusions: Our data suggest a community-based lung cancer screening programme in deprived areas positively impacts smoking behaviour, with no evidence of a ‘licence to smoke’ in those screened.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)41-46
Number of pages6
JournalLung Cancer
Volume139
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2020
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Early detection
  • Lung cancer screening
  • Smoking cessation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
  • Cancer Research

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Attending community-based lung cancer screening influences smoking behaviour in deprived populations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this