TY - JOUR
T1 - Assessment of vibration–dissociation coupling models for hypersonic nonequilibrium simulations
AU - Hao, Jiaao
AU - Wang, Jingying
AU - Lee, Chunhian
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Elsevier Masson SAS
Copyright:
Copyright 2017 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2017/8/1
Y1 - 2017/8/1
N2 - The fidelity of three widely-used two-temperature vibration–dissociation coupling models, including the Park model (1988), the Macheret–Fridman model (1994), and the coupled vibration–dissociation–vibration (CVDV) model (1963), is numerically investigated via a comparison with state-specific results and existing shock tube data for oxygen flows. Under the hypothetical condition where a Boltzmann distribution corresponding to a vibrational temperature is assumed, it is found that the CVDV model with a proper parameter is capable of providing the most accurate results, whereas the Park and Macheret–Fridman models present similar prediction accuracy for which the nonequilibrium dissociation rate coefficients could be as much as three orders of magnitude lower than state-specific values. However, for actual postshock flows with intensive vibrational excitation and dissociation processes, the CVDV model still shows significant discrepancies relative to state-specific results and experimental data, presenting a much lower vibrational temperature and a higher degree of dissociation. The essential cause for the disagreement lies in the existence of non-Boltzmann distributions observed when the incubation period is over and dissociation starts to dominate. Recommendations on further modification of two-temperature vibration–dissociation coupling models are presented.
AB - The fidelity of three widely-used two-temperature vibration–dissociation coupling models, including the Park model (1988), the Macheret–Fridman model (1994), and the coupled vibration–dissociation–vibration (CVDV) model (1963), is numerically investigated via a comparison with state-specific results and existing shock tube data for oxygen flows. Under the hypothetical condition where a Boltzmann distribution corresponding to a vibrational temperature is assumed, it is found that the CVDV model with a proper parameter is capable of providing the most accurate results, whereas the Park and Macheret–Fridman models present similar prediction accuracy for which the nonequilibrium dissociation rate coefficients could be as much as three orders of magnitude lower than state-specific values. However, for actual postshock flows with intensive vibrational excitation and dissociation processes, the CVDV model still shows significant discrepancies relative to state-specific results and experimental data, presenting a much lower vibrational temperature and a higher degree of dissociation. The essential cause for the disagreement lies in the existence of non-Boltzmann distributions observed when the incubation period is over and dissociation starts to dominate. Recommendations on further modification of two-temperature vibration–dissociation coupling models are presented.
KW - Hypersonic
KW - State-specific method
KW - Thermochemical nonequilibrium
KW - Vibration–dissociation coupling
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85019149308&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ast.2017.04.027
DO - 10.1016/j.ast.2017.04.027
M3 - Journal article
AN - SCOPUS:85019149308
SN - 1270-9638
VL - 67
SP - 433
EP - 442
JO - Aerospace Science and Technology
JF - Aerospace Science and Technology
ER -