Abstract
We examine, for various educational characteristics of hedge fund managers, the performance profile of hedge fund portfolios along their managers’ professional experience path. We find that during the initial years following their graduation, hedge fund managers who majored in business or economics outperform other managers. However, in subsequent years, hedge fund managers who studied science or engineering improve their performance and eventually outperform all other managers. These results are consistent with the view that business education is a substitute for, while science education is a complement to, job experience in acquiring the skills that help hedge fund managers generate excess returns. Compared with cross section studies of the impact of educational variables on productivity, our performance measures are more likely to represent individual productivity, and our estimates are less likely to be biased because of a correlation between educational variables and time-invariant characteristics, such as ability.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1247-1278 |
Number of pages | 32 |
Journal | Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting |
Volume | 54 |
Issue number | 4 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 May 2020 |
Keywords
- Complementarity
- Education and productivity
- Education area
- Hedge fund performance
- Work experience
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Accounting
- General Business,Management and Accounting
- Finance