TY - JOUR
T1 - An integrated scientometric and sna approach to explore the classics in cem research
AU - Wu, Hengqin
AU - Zhao, Zebin
AU - Xue, Xiaolong
AU - Shen, Geoffrey Qiping
AU - Yang, Rebecca Jing
AU - Wang, Luqi
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was supported by the National Social Science Fund of China under Grant No. 18ZDA043. The work described in this paper was also funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) under Grant NO. 71671053, NO. 71771067, NO. 71841024, the National Key R&D Program of China under Grant No. 2016YFC0701800 and No. 2016YFC0701808, and the Guangdong Science and Technology Program under Grant No. 2019B101001019.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 The Author(s). Published by VGTU Press.
Copyright:
Copyright 2020 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2020/5/7
Y1 - 2020/5/7
N2 - This study explores the classics that significantly contribute to the research of construction engineering and management (CEM). Previous studies usually simply applied the number of citation to identify the classics, causing some flaws. To overcome the flaws, an advanced approach is developed by integrating scientometric methods (G-index and co-citation analysis) and a social network analysis (SNA) technique (modularity optimization algorithm), thus providing more precise and persuasive results that denote what academic works have made significant inspirations and illuminations on CEM research. This study retrieves 13,273 CEM literature and extracts 336,129 bibliographies from these literature. Based on the G-index, a total of 67 publications are identified as CEM classics. Moreover, this paper measures and maps the structure of the classics by using co-citation analysis and modularity optimization algorithm. The results provide a basic source of academic information representing the foundation of CEM and draw a big picture of CEM to show the underlying associations between the identified classics. This can help researchers recognize the key scientific contributions for improving the academy progress.
AB - This study explores the classics that significantly contribute to the research of construction engineering and management (CEM). Previous studies usually simply applied the number of citation to identify the classics, causing some flaws. To overcome the flaws, an advanced approach is developed by integrating scientometric methods (G-index and co-citation analysis) and a social network analysis (SNA) technique (modularity optimization algorithm), thus providing more precise and persuasive results that denote what academic works have made significant inspirations and illuminations on CEM research. This study retrieves 13,273 CEM literature and extracts 336,129 bibliographies from these literature. Based on the G-index, a total of 67 publications are identified as CEM classics. Moreover, this paper measures and maps the structure of the classics by using co-citation analysis and modularity optimization algorithm. The results provide a basic source of academic information representing the foundation of CEM and draw a big picture of CEM to show the underlying associations between the identified classics. This can help researchers recognize the key scientific contributions for improving the academy progress.
KW - Classics
KW - Co-citation analysis
KW - Construction engineering and management
KW - G-index
KW - Modularity optimization
KW - Social network analysis
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85088925954&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3846/jcem.2020.12645
DO - 10.3846/jcem.2020.12645
M3 - Journal article
AN - SCOPUS:85088925954
SN - 1392-3730
VL - 26
SP - 459
EP - 474
JO - Journal of Civil Engineering and Management
JF - Journal of Civil Engineering and Management
IS - 5
ER -