An epistemic approach for IAQ assessment of air-conditioned offices in Hong Kong

Research output: Chapter in book / Conference proceedingConference article published in proceeding or bookAcademic researchpeer-review

Abstract

Continuous sampling is one of the common approaches for assessing the exposure concentrations of common air pollutants. To determine the acceptable indoor air quality (IAQ) of a space, assessment uncertainties must be included. Based on the prior understanding of test sample failure probability, this study proposes an epistemic IAQ assessment approach. The prior failure rates of office IAQ were derived from a large scale regional survey of 330 typical offices in Hong Kong. For demonstration, a sample test result was used to assess the IAQ acceptance against an action CO2level with assessment uncertainties which were precalculated from a longitudinal year-round measurement carried out in a chosen office. With an 'agreed' range of acceptable assessment uncertainties, different parties involved in IAQ monitoring can make better decisions to devise the appropriate and cost-effective sampling strategies for IAQ control and improvement.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publication9th International Conference on Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management 2008, PSAM 2008
Pages2570-2574
Number of pages5
Volume3
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2008
Event9th International Conference on Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management 2008, PSAM 2008 - Hong Kong, Hong Kong
Duration: 18 May 200823 May 2008

Conference

Conference9th International Conference on Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management 2008, PSAM 2008
Country/TerritoryHong Kong
CityHong Kong
Period18/05/0823/05/08

Keywords

  • CO 2
  • Epistemic assessment
  • IAQ
  • Offices

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality
  • Statistics and Probability

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'An epistemic approach for IAQ assessment of air-conditioned offices in Hong Kong'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this