Abstract
Objective This study aimed to validate this smartphone application by comparing its measurement with a laboratory-based reference condition. Methods Thirty-two healthy elderly people were asked to perform the FTSTS and TUG tests in a randomized sequence. During the tests, their performance was concurrently measured by the smartphone application and a force sensor installed in the backrest of a chair. The intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC(2,1)] and Bland–Altman analysis were used to calculate the measurement consistency and agreement, respectively, between these two methods. Results The smartphone application demonstrated excellent measurement consistency with the lab-based reference condition for the FTSTS test [ICC(2,1) = 0.988] and TUG test [ICC(2,1) = 0.946]. We observed a positive bias of 0.27 seconds (95% limits of agreement, −1.22 to 1.76 seconds) for the FTSTS test and 0.48 seconds (95% limits of agreement, −1.66 to 2.63 seconds) for the TUG test. Conclusion We cross-validated the newly developed smartphone application with the laboratory-based reference condition during the examination of FTSTS and TUG test performance in healthy elderly.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1-4 |
Number of pages | 4 |
Journal | Hong Kong Physiotherapy Journal |
Volume | 35 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Dec 2016 |
Keywords
- aging
- five-time sit-to-stand
- geriatric assessment
- physical examination
- timed up-and-go
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation