TY - JOUR
T1 - A perspective on the recovery mechanisms of spent lithium iron phosphate cathode materials in different oxidation environments
AU - Liu, Kang
AU - Wang, Mengmeng
AU - Zhang, Qiaozhi
AU - Xu, Zibo
AU - Labianca, Claudia
AU - Komárek, Michael
AU - Gao, Bin
AU - Tsang, Daniel C.W.
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was supported by Hong Kong Research Grants Council (PolyU 15222020 ) and National Natural Science Foundation of China ( 51908318 ).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2023/3/5
Y1 - 2023/3/5
N2 - Oxidative extraction has become an economically viable option for recycling lithium (Li) from spent lithium iron phosphate (LiFePO4) batteries. In this study, the releases behaviour of Li from spent LiFePO4 batteries under different oxidizing conditions was investigated with sodium hypochlorite (NaClO) as the solid oxidant. We revealed that, due to the intervention of graphitic carbon, the generated species of Li in mechanochemical oxidation (NaClO:LiFePO4 at a molar ratio of 2:1, 5 min, and 600 rpm) was lithium carbonate (Li2CO3). The graphite layer provided a channel for the conversion of Li species released by mechanochemical oxidation. While in hydrometallurgical oxidation (NaClO:LiFePO4 at a molar ratio of 2:1 and 12.5 min), the presence of hydrogen species led to the formation of lithium chloride (LiCl). Moreover, life cycle assessment (LCA) demonstrated that for recycling 1.0 kg of spent LiFePO4 batteries, mechanochemical and hydrometallurgical oxidation could reduce carbon footprints by 2.81 kg CO2 eq and 2.88 kg CO2 eq, respectively. Our results indicate that the oxidative environment determines the release pathway of Li from the spent LiFePO4 cathode material, thereby regulating the product forms of Li and environmental impacts. This study can provide key technical guidance for Li recycling from spent LiFePO4 batteries.
AB - Oxidative extraction has become an economically viable option for recycling lithium (Li) from spent lithium iron phosphate (LiFePO4) batteries. In this study, the releases behaviour of Li from spent LiFePO4 batteries under different oxidizing conditions was investigated with sodium hypochlorite (NaClO) as the solid oxidant. We revealed that, due to the intervention of graphitic carbon, the generated species of Li in mechanochemical oxidation (NaClO:LiFePO4 at a molar ratio of 2:1, 5 min, and 600 rpm) was lithium carbonate (Li2CO3). The graphite layer provided a channel for the conversion of Li species released by mechanochemical oxidation. While in hydrometallurgical oxidation (NaClO:LiFePO4 at a molar ratio of 2:1 and 12.5 min), the presence of hydrogen species led to the formation of lithium chloride (LiCl). Moreover, life cycle assessment (LCA) demonstrated that for recycling 1.0 kg of spent LiFePO4 batteries, mechanochemical and hydrometallurgical oxidation could reduce carbon footprints by 2.81 kg CO2 eq and 2.88 kg CO2 eq, respectively. Our results indicate that the oxidative environment determines the release pathway of Li from the spent LiFePO4 cathode material, thereby regulating the product forms of Li and environmental impacts. This study can provide key technical guidance for Li recycling from spent LiFePO4 batteries.
KW - Life cycle assessment
KW - Lithium extraction
KW - Lithium iron phosphate battery
KW - Oxidation behaviour
KW - Sustainable waste management
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85144081959&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.130502
DO - 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.130502
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 36493647
AN - SCOPUS:85144081959
SN - 0304-3894
VL - 445
JO - Journal of Hazardous Materials
JF - Journal of Hazardous Materials
M1 - 130502
ER -