Abstract
This paper explores the conditions where Mandarin RVCs can be preserved in their Cantonese counterparts. Six types of Mandarin RVCs - ergatives, unergatives, accusatives, causatives, pseudo-passives and object-fronting - have been examined. Modifications have been made for certain kinds of RVCs that are usually misclassified. The analysis has been done at both the lexical and syntactic levels. At the lexical level, the concept of 'strong resultative' and 'weak resultative' has been adduced to support the idea that indirect causation cannot be expressed by RVC in Cantonese. At the syntactic level, the presentations of the same RVCs falling into different sentence types are illustrated. Since the structure of Mandarin RVCs are often restricted in Cantonese, three substitutive constructions have been introduced for presenting the same resultatives in Cantonese.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | 29th Pacific Asia Conference on Language, Information and Computation, PACLIC 2015 |
Publisher | Shanghai Jiao Tong University |
Pages | 231-239 |
Number of pages | 9 |
Publication status | Published - 1 Jan 2015 |
Event | 29th Pacific Asia Conference on Language, Information and Computation, PACLIC 2015 - Shanghai, China Duration: 30 Oct 2015 → 1 Nov 2015 |
Conference
Conference | 29th Pacific Asia Conference on Language, Information and Computation, PACLIC 2015 |
---|---|
Country/Territory | China |
City | Shanghai |
Period | 30/10/15 → 1/11/15 |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Artificial Intelligence
- Human-Computer Interaction
- Linguistics and Language